February 7, 2025

North Carolina Appeals Court Ruling Alters Blue Light Case

Northford Structural Connections (NSC)

Northford Structural Connections (NSC) specializes in innovative engineering solutions for enhancing the safety and durability of precast concrete structures. Their patented products, including the Double-Tee Flexible Connection (DTFC) and Double-Tee Connection Pro (DTC Pro), address critical challenges like fatigue, corrosion, and seismic resilience. With a focus on quality and longevity, NSC provides advanced connection systems trusted by industry professionals for both retrofitting and new construction projects.

News Summary

The North Carolina Court of Appeals has reversed a lower court decision favoring Southeastern Company Police regarding their use of blue lights during a construction project. This ruling sends the case back to an administrative law judge, highlighting the ongoing legal dispute over the legality of private police operations. The implications of this case extend beyond Southeastern, potentially affecting other contractors in the state as legal proceedings continue amidst a complex web of lawsuits.

North Carolina Court of Appeals Shakes Up Blue Light Controversy

In a shocking legal twist, the North Carolina Court of Appeals has turned the tables on a lower court ruling that previously favored Southeastern Company Police, the private police contractor at the heart of a heated dispute involving the illegal use of flashing blue lights. The Appeals Court’s unanimous decision has sent the case back to an administrative law judge, signaling that this contentious legal battle has only just begun.

The Blue Light Controversy Explained

The dispute originates from Southeastern’s operations during a construction project on a critical segment of Interstate 77 in Charlotte, which was commissioned by contractor Sugar Creek Construction in 2016. The private police agency was employed for policing and traffic control on a 26-mile stretch of the highway. However, the legality of their methods came into question in 2017 when a complaint was lodged against them by an operations manager from a competing private security company.

The complaint primarily centered around the use of flashing blue and red lights on the Southeastern vehicles, a practice deemed illegal for private contractors. Subsequent to the complaint, Randy Munn, an administrator from the Department of Justice, delivered a stark warning to Southeastern. He underscored that their officers were permitted solely within the confines of barricaded construction zones and were unequivocally prohibited from using blue lights to obstruct travel lanes on state-maintained highways.

Severe Consequences Looming

Along with the warning came a chilling prospect of dire penalties, including the potential revocation of Southeastern’s certification under the Company Police Act. The severity of the situation prompted Southeastern to pull its officers from the worksite, thus sparking a labyrinth of lawsuits traversing both state and federal courts.

A Legal Tug-of-War

The crux of the current lawsuit asserts that Munn overstepped his bounds, depriving Southeastern of both rights and property. An administrative law judge had initially ruled in favor of the Department of Justice in 2022, reinforcing the legal limitations placed on Southeastern.

However, this decision took a dramatic turn in August 2023 when a Superior Court judge reversed the ruling, siding with Southeastern without conclusively determining the ownership or jurisdiction of the I-77 section related to the dispute.

Appeals Court Findings

In their recent ruling, the Appeals Court shed light on some critical shortcomings in the hierarchy of command within this case. The court revealed that neither Sugar Creek Construction nor the primary contractor, Mobility Partners, possessed the necessary ownership rights required to authorize Southeastern’s policing actions under existing legal conventions. This strikes at the very heart of the agreements in place, as the court emphasized that such contractual arrangements do not permit any legal infringements.

Wider Appeals Court Agenda

The implications of this ruling stretch beyond the blue light controversy. The court has also echoed its focus on various other pressing legal matters. These include a dispute over a proposed solar farm and legal challenges related to election ballots. Notably, the Appeals Court has also endorsed a mother pursuing legal action against a State Highway Patrol trooper tied to a 2020 car crash.

Further under the judicial microscope, TikTok’s recent efforts to dismiss a lawsuit brought against them by Governor Josh Stein are being evaluated, adding another layer of intrigue to the ongoing legal battles in North Carolina.

What’s Next?

As the case heads back to an administrative law judge, the stakes could not be higher. The ruling not only complicates Southeastern’s future but may also have far-reaching implications for other private police contractors operating in similar capacities across the state. Legal experts predict that this contentious blue light issue is far from resolution, and both sides are preparing for another fierce round of legal maneuvers.

North Carolina’s judiciary system and law enforcement operations will undoubtedly remain under close scrutiny as this dramatic saga continues to unfold.